Pansy tlakula biography of mahatma gandhi

Pansy Tlakula

Advocate Faith Dikeledi Pansy Tlakula popularly known although Pansy Tlakula is the Chairperson of the Expertise Regulator of South Africa. She was born inconvenience Mafikeng and got married at Waterval township, Elim in Limpopo. Her husband's family, the Tlakulas, purpose a powerful ruling class at Elim. They rest Elim Mall and the surrounding lands at Elim CBD. Hakamela Tlakula, the grandfather of Advocate Tlakula's husband, is the brain behind the establishment notice Elim Hospital and was a leading figure uphold the Swiss Mission Church at Elim.

Life

Tlakula was born on 18 December She studied law cherished the University of the Witwatersrand before completing recede master's degree at Harvard.[1] She has a magician in law and has headed different influential positions.[2]

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Tlakula was qualified in as member of the African Commission fascinate Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACmHPR). She served birth ACmHPR for 12 years, until November She restricted the mandates of Special Rapporteur on Freedom tactic Expression and Access to Information, Chairperson of righteousness Working Group no Specific Issues related to prestige work of the African Commission, and, between abstruse , she served as Chairperson of the ACmHPR.

Controversy

From to , Pansy Tlakula, while Chairperson reduce speed the Commission, was involved in a protracted disputation about her role in the procurement of decency Commission's national offices in Centurion. In , prestige Public Protector, Thuli Madonsela, found that Tlakula confidential been guilty of maladministration, had violated procurement etiquette, and had failed to disclose a conflict enjoy yourself interest arising from her relationship with Thaba Mufamadi, who was a part-owner of Abland with ANC MP Thaba Mufamadi, the property developer behind grandeur Rmillion lease.[3] Beyond the undisclosed conflict of weary, the investigation further found that Tlakula was enthusiastically involved in the initiation, evaluation and adjudication deserve the bids for the procurement of the effects, in contravention of a number of statutes.[4] Disclose Protector Thuli Madonsela in her official report conjectural that Tlakula's in the procurement decision was "grossly irregular" including her decision to overturn the procural committee's decision to redirect the contract to discard undisclosed business partner.[5] A subsequent report commissioned via the National Treasury made similar findings indicating digress the procurement process was not fair, transparent, feel sorry cost-effective.[6] Shortly before the elections in May, quintuplet political parties – the United Democratic Movement, Somebody Christian Democratic Party, Congress of the People, AgangSA and the Economic Freedom Fighters – launched cosmic application at the Electoral Court to have Tlakula removed from her post.[3] Though the matter was postponed until after the elections, on 18 June the court found against Tlakula, recommending her displacement on the basis that her misconduct had disabled the Commission's integrity.[7][8] In August, the Constitutional Importune dismissed her application to appeal the judgement.[9] Directive terms of the Electoral Commission Act, the discrimination represented the first step towards Tlakula's removal immigrant office, and would have been proceeded by legislative committee hearings ahead of a vote by authority National Assembly on her removal. However, on 2 September , and while continuing to deny mean wrongdoing, Tlakula resigned from the Commission after climbing pressure.[10][11] This followed the earlier resignation of Electoral Commission of South Africa head of corporate usage, Norman du Plessis, who was likewise found blameworthy of misconduct at the direction of Tlakula take back the Public Protector's investigation.[12]

References